Barbara Comyns’s The Vet’s Daughter was not what I expected, but then, this is my third Comyns novel and none of them have been what I expected. Our Spoons Came From Woolworths was my first one, and it was an unsettling mix of a light, breezy tone and dark subject matter. Who Was Changed and Who Was Dead
remains my favorite Comyns so far; it’s very strange, opening with
ducks swimming in and out of drawing room windows and staying on a
similar off-beat note. The world of the book seems familiar, but it’s
not, quite. The Vet’s Daughter is perhaps more like Our Spoons than Who Was Changed, but it’s darker in tone throughout. But it also veers off in some odd directions, especially in the second half.
It tells the story of Alice, the daughter of the title, who lives in
London with her bitter, nasty father and her ailing mother. She’s trying
to give her mother as much help as she can, but her mother is on her
way out of this world, and now the daughter is going to be left to
manage her father on her own as best as she can. She has a friend Lucy,
but she can only see her occasionally, and Lucy is deaf, which makes
communication difficult. The vet’s practice has sinister aspects to it; a
vivisectionist stops by to pick up unwanted animals and many of the
animals they keep suffer. There are few bright spots in Alice’s life.
One is Mrs. Churchill, who is a companion to the family during and after
Alice’s mother’s illness. She provides some needed stability.
Mr. Peebles is not exactly a bright spot in Alice’s life, but he’s a
friend and one with some power to provide Alice with much-needed
diversions. He is another veterinarian who has helped with the family
vet practice, and it becomes clear early on that he is attracted to
Alice. It seems as though he might provide an escape, but Alice does not
return his feelings. She spends time with him but considers him only a
friend, although marriage is always there as a possibility should she
get desperate enough. She walks a line between honesty and deception,
trying to get what pleasure she can out of his company without leading
him on.
All this takes place in the gloomy setting of poverty-stricken
London, but this is only the first half of the novel. In the second half
Alice heads out toward the English coast to live with Mr. Peebles’s
mother. She is a depressed woman living in a house that’s halfway burned
to the ground, being cared for by a truly strange, scarily sinister
couple, the Gowleys. Alice’s job is to be a companion. She is still
isolated here, this time geographically isolated as well as emotionally
so, but this job brings some new opportunities with it. Alice learns
about the countryside and its ways, and she also learns about sexual
desire, as she meets Nicholas, a young, attractive soldier who teaches
her how to ice skate and seems to be attracted to her as well. This
relationship puts her feelings toward Mr. Peebles in a new light; she
knows now what real attraction can be and marriage Mr. Peebles takes on
an even duller, bleaker aspect.
I think I’ll stop there with a discussion of the plot, except to say
that levitation becomes an important plot point, and I’m trying to
figure out what to make of this. Alice had a couple experiences with
levitation during her sleep while in London, and it happens again out on
the coast. She experiments a bit and discovers she can levitate at
will, although it takes a lot of energy and focus. When her father finds
out about her ability, it becomes another way he can exploit her, and
her life closes in on her again. But what are we supposed to make of
this? I first thought she was merely dreaming that she could levitate
and that it was a metaphor for her desire for freedom or something like
that. But then what I thought was a metaphor becomes real and she
actually does have the ability to float up into the air. Of course, it
is still a metaphor even though it’s “real” — her ability to levitate
only sets her apart and leads to more suffering and despair. The thing
that makes her special makes her miserable, and there is no chance for
escape, ever.
I’m still not sure what I think of the book as a whole, and I’m
looking forward to reading other people’s thoughts. I liked the first
person narration; the story is told through Alice’s eyes in her
forthright, no-nonsense tone. Alice is so young — only seventeen — and
she hasn’t had the chance to do much in her life, but she has seen a lot
of suffering. One of the first things she tells us is that “if [my
mother] had been a dog, my father would have destroyed her.” She
describes her father’s cruelties matter-of-factly and without dwelling
on the darkness of it all, but there’s a sadness to the tone as well, as
though she knows life isn’t ever going to offer much, in spite of her
hopes. When Nicholas betrays her, she is not really surprised. But I’m
not sure how to integrate the two parts of the book, particularly the
very ending. The note the book ends on seems appropriate, but to get
there by way of levitation? I’m curious what other people think of the
value of bringing in this fantastical? supernatural? element.
But I definitely can conclude that Comyns is a writer I want to read
in full. I love how she’s full of surprises and that her novels have so
much variety. I love the darkness and twistedness of her worlds, and the
way she look at that darkness straight on.
"The thing that makes her special makes her miserable": that's such an interesting point.
ReplyDeleteI wondered so much about Nicholas. It was hard to believe he took any interest in her, but it seemed to be going so well! And then when he dumped her for the other girl, it seemed so in keeping with how awful poor Alice's life always turns out to be. Do you think he was ever romantic about her? I couldn't decide how reliable a narrator she was.
My impression was that Nicholas was simply toying with her. After the betrayal, Alice was shocked but on some level expected it, perhaps just because so much else had gone wrong in her life already. I'm not sure about Alice's unreliability -- it's a tricky question. I guess I think she's generally right in her view of the world, but perhaps with Nicholas hope and desire got in the way of clear thinking. And lack of experience.
ReplyDeleteMy impression with Nicholas was that he genuinely liked her but wasn't necessarily serious about her, but she didn't have enough experience to understand his intentions.
ReplyDeleteI didn't have the impression that Alice was unreliable, at least not intentionally. She might have missed things that she then didn't convey to the reader.